DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008551295-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-16

000116910

Contested design: 008551295-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085512950001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ze Yanvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Friedrichstr. 123, 10117 Berlin, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yan Bai

China (CN)

No. 7, Tanxi Third Alley, Tanxin Street, Zanhuang Town, Zanhuang County, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Maria Pastor Palomares

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 4

Allasfun Barbell Curling Barbell Weight Exercise Home Fitness Exercise Equipment

ASIN B08 MFD QBYZ; https://www.amazon.com · Amazon.com · disclosed 2020-11-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested exercise bar design lacked novelty over earlier product images, especially Annex 4 showing the same bar configuration.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon.com listing for the Allasfun barbell product, first available on 2 November 2020, before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the novelty challenge went undefended.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing sufficiently proved prior disclosure under Article 7(1) and that any stopper-thickness difference was immaterial.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of novelty, and costs of EUR 350 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218