DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008302756-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-17

000114705

Contested design: 008302756-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 008302756-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 008302756-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Inhabers, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SIA Klumelvia PDF extraction

LV

Kurzemes prospekts 88-33, Riga, 1069, Lettland

Represented by

Jānis Kļumels

Holder · RCD owner

Albert Ungrad

Austria (AT)

Nöstach 155, 2571 Altenmarkt, Österreich

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

foldable artificial Christmas tree / foldable plywood Christmas tree

RCD No 008275184-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-11-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 25(1)(d)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD D1 and also invoked Article 25(1)(d).
  • The holder argued that the contested design was new and had individual character, and that D1 did not preclude registration.
  • The Division found Article 25(1)(d) inapplicable because D1 had already been disclosed before the contested design's filing date.
  • The Division accepted D1 as prior disclosure but held the designs were not identical and created different overall impressions, so novelty and individual character remained.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.0311.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)099
000114489

vs Hangzhou XiangHui International Trading Co., Ltd.

2021-07-27Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)099
000103859

vs PHOENIX IND SA

2019-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)099
000123774

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)11, 098
000124459

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-10-04Art 25(1)(b)11, 098
000121618

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)11, 098
000122480

vs Lilou Sp. z o.o.

2025-06-03Art 25(1)(b)117
000127595

vs Shenzhen Beipengxing Technology Co., Ltd

2025-04-15Art 25(1)(b)097