DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002126649-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-03

000122480

Contested design: 002126649-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 002126649-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tomasz Bentkowskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

62-005 Owińska, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Lilou Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

02-032 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Łukasz Baszczyński

Prior art cited (1)

PublicationAnnex 3

Lilac four-lobed device depicted in the medieval architecture of an arch.

Article on medieval architecture · disclosed 2015-11-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on a prior lilac motif shown in medieval architectural arches.
  • The holder's response is not separately reproduced in this remittal decision; the case proceeded after the Board admitted Annex 3 as evidence of disclosure.
  • The Division accepted that the prior motif had been made available to the public before the filing date under Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • Despite shared four-lobed floral symmetry, the Division found clear differences in petal shape, thickness and the prior design's arch framing, producing a different overall impression.
  • The contested design retained individual character, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122480

vs Lilou Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)117
000120678

vs POMELLATO S.p.A.

2023-11-23Art 25(1)(b)117
000119878

vs Henan Nanhua Qianmu Biological Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-11Art 25(1)(b)117
000117656

vs Fleurop AG

2022-12-20Art 25(1)(b)117
000117858

vs Fleurop AG

2022-12-19Art 25(1)(b)117
000117632

vs Yiwu Hongyu Trading Company

2022-10-06Art 25(1)(b)117
000114705

vs Albert Ungrad

2022-03-17Art 25(1)(b)117
000114121

vs YES BIŻUTERIA SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2022-02-09Art 25(1)(b)117