DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008276968-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-06

000117632

Contested design: 008276968-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0082769680001 is rejected. 3. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nadir Gezervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Bünzwangerstr. 8, 73061 Ebersbach, Germany

Represented by

Jan Marschner

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu Hongyu Trading Company

China (CN)

6th Floor, No. 12, Danchen 1st Road, Beiyuan Street, Yiwu City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

rose bear

ASIN B07S5KZXB2 · Amazon · disclosed 2019-06-06

Web disclosureD2

rose bear

ASIN B07THBTHTK · Amazon · disclosed 2019-06-23

Web disclosureD3

rose bear

ASIN B081YG5848 · Amazon · disclosed 2019-12-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on three Amazon product listings for earlier rose-bear designs.
  • The holder did not file observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listings as prior disclosures under Article 7 but found visible differences in proportions, bear features, rose arrangement, and undisclosed views.
  • Because none of the prior designs was identical to the contested design, the novelty attack failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122480

vs Lilou Sp. z o.o.

2025-06-03Art 25(1)(b)117
000122480

vs Lilou Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-23Art 25(1)(b)117
000120678

vs POMELLATO S.p.A.

2023-11-23Art 25(1)(b)117
000119878

vs Henan Nanhua Qianmu Biological Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-11Art 25(1)(b)117
000117656

vs Fleurop AG

2022-12-20Art 25(1)(b)117
000117858

vs Fleurop AG

2022-12-19Art 25(1)(b)117
000114705

vs Albert Ungrad

2022-03-17Art 25(1)(b)117
000114121

vs YES BIŻUTERIA SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2022-02-09Art 25(1)(b)117