DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007745252-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-21

000115545

Contested design: 007745252-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD No 007745252-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. El dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º-007745252 0001 se declara nulo 3. Las costas sufragadas por la titular, fijadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Piffany Copenhagen ApSvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Bymosevej 17, 3200 Helsinge, Dinamarca

Represented by

BECH-BRUUN Law Firm

Holder · RCD owner

Deluxe holding ApSvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Niels Bohrs Vej 12 A., 6000 Kolding Denmark

Represented by

Løje IP

Prior art cited (2)

Prior useD1⚠ rejected as evidence

LED candle product 'User UNI' shown in trade-fair images

trade fair images / Villepinte fair · disclosed 2020-01-17

CatalogD2

Sompex pillar candle/light holder, 25 cm

Sompex lifestyle 2017, model No. 39050 · Sompex lifestyle catalog

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on trade-fair images of its LED candle and a 2017 Sompex catalog disclosure.
  • The holder filed observations late; they were admitted. It argued the design had distinctive top-surface and flame features, D2 was unclear or undisclosed, and the market was saturated.
  • The Division rejected D1 because the images did not objectively prove when, where, or in what public circumstances the design was disclosed under Article 7(1).
  • The Division accepted D2 as a public catalog disclosure and found the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user, given broad designer freedom.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila delictiva ELIŠOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI — ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268