DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007956230-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-21

000115847

Contested design: 007956230-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007956230-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Love Sports Technology Co,.LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

SimplyWork 46D, Tianshucang Floor 4th, Wangkexinghuo Online South No.2, Wuhe Road, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shen Zhen 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Weiya Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Jiedao Zhen Jiguan, Shipodian Town Yu'an District, Liuan City Anhui 237131, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

NedFoss Serbian Chef Knife / boning knife offered on amazon.de

ASIN B07TYJZK8N · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-07-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an amazon.de knife listing disclosed before the contested design’s filing date.
  • The holders requested re-service of the application but ultimately filed no substantive observations within the extended deadline.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient proof of public disclosure and found the prior knife created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holders were ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078