DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008370712-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-21

000116809

Contested design: 008370712-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 8370712-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kontri Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Jacka Kuronia 3, 15-569, Bialystok, Poland

Represented by

Michał Jędrzejewski

Holder · RCD owner

Hunan Ample Trading Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Rm. 1521, F15, Bldg. 1, Xixiangjundi, No. 59, Yuelu Avenue, Yinpen South Rd., Yinpenling St., Yuelu Changsha, Hunan People’s Republic of China

Represented by

MARINOS CLEANTHOUS

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Selonis playpen with basket and 100 balls for children

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 088 ZHC 6KQ · Amazon Germany · disclosed 2020-05-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an earlier Amazon listing of a similar children’s playpen disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, leaving the invalidity claim undefended.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and treated the listed playpen design as prior art.
  • It found the contested design and prior design produced the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor differences in colour, door size, and accessories.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068