DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007959994-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-23

000116810

Contested design: 007959994-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0079599940001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Thomas Wiegreffevia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Artillerieweg 52, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Yingying Guo

China (CN)

Wenchang Street, No. 149 Nangang District, Haerbin city, Heilongjiang Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Aoweika hula hoop offered on amazon.de

ASIN B07YJBSMBW · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-09-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested hula-hoop design lacked novelty and individual character because the same appearance had been offered for sale on amazon.de before filing.
  • Applicant relied on amazon.de printouts and screenshots for ASIN B07YJBSMBW, including a product listing from 28 September 2019 and a later customer comment with product image.
  • Holder filed no observations, so the Division accepted the internet disclosure as proven and found the compared designs differed only in an immaterial shade variation.
  • The Division found no novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR, upheld the invalidity application, declared the contested design invalid, and awarded costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218