DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006308623-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-25

000114493

Contested design: 006308623-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006308623-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nintendo of Europe GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Goldstreinstrasse 235, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen CHT Technology CO., LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building L, ShengGuang Industrial Area, NO.152 DongHuan Road, XinQiao Street, Bao'An District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Nintendo Switch game controllers

http://nintendo.com · Internet Archive · disclosed 2017-08-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the controller design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier game-controller designs, especially D1, and also alleged inconsistent views under Article 25(1)(a).
  • Holder argued novelty and individual character were preserved because configuration and buttons differed, and claimed designer freedom was limited by technical requirements and screen placement.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed online before the filing date and found the designer's freedom broad despite functional elements in game control pads.
  • It held that the contested design created the same overall impression as D1, lacked individual character, and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218