DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008568166-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-25

000116887

Contested design: 008568166-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085681660001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Utopia Towels Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

8 Elaine Pl, Plainview, New York NY 11803, United States of America

Represented by

Awa Sweden AB

Holder · RCD owner

Xifeng Jiang

China (CN)

Cencunhonghuagang Yi Xiang 6 Hao, Changxingjiedao, Tianhequ, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Tong Yang Slu

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Utopia Home Set of 8 Pantry Organizers; individual organiser/container from the set

https://www.amazon.com; ASIN B07TZPF6PM · Amazon.com · disclosed 2019-07-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested pantry-storage container lacked novelty and individual character because an identical or highly similar organiser had been sold on Amazon since 5 July 2019.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not rebut the alleged online disclosure or the similarity analysis.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout and customer comments as sufficient evidence that the earlier organiser had been made available to the public before the filing date.
  • It found the common shape, side cut-outs, transparent material, and fluted bottom outweighed minor proportion differences, so the same overall impression was produced on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078