DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007844907-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-04-12

000115302

Contested design: 007844907-0003

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007844907-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

PKMEBEL.PL Sp. z o.o. Sp.k.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Młyńska 1A, 63-604 Baranów, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Wojciech Lech

Wojciech Lech

Holder · RCD owner

‘Górna Półka’ Kamil Zielińskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Elewatorska 29C/5, 15-620 Białystok, Poland

Represented by

Dorota Biegańska

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

hallway furniture set/cabinet configuration with backrest panels, double seat and cupboard

Zestaw 2P8 · Anedo.pl Facebook and Instagram accounts · disclosed 2020-03-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested hallway furniture design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier social-media disclosures of the Anedo.pl set.
  • Holder said its own earlier RAGNAR and ODIS disclosures predated the cited design, the applicant copied those models, and the visual differences changed the overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Anedo.pl posts as prior disclosure and found the holder failed to prove an earlier grace-period disclosure attributable to the contested design’s designer or holder.
  • Comparing overall impressions, the Division found the common structure and features outweighed minor panel-shape and board differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0106.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068