DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007076039-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-04-29

000117027

Contested design: 007076039-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007076039-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

AFG Media Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Ground Floor, The Tun, 6-8 Jackson's Entry, Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh, EH8 BPJ United Kingdom

Represented by

Frkelly

Holder · RCD owner

Weiwei Wang

China (CN)

No.520, Group Tenth, Laowangji Village, Zhangqiao country, Zhecheng County, Henan, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureA1/B1/C1/D1-D2

Alien Inflatable Costume

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sprs3ihmFuA ; https://archive.org/web/ ; https://amazon.fr/Morph-Costumes-D%C3%A9guisement-Gonflable-%C2%AB-Alien/dp/B06XKMP9KX/ ; https://twitter.com/thismorning/status/921095632089165827 ; ASIN B06XKMP9KX · Amazon France, YouTube, Internet Archive, and This Morning/Twitter · disclosed 2017-06-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested inflatable toy design reproduced its earlier Alien Inflatable Costume already disclosed online and on television in 2017.
  • Holder was invited to comment but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the online and broadcast evidence as corroborating disclosure of the same prior costume and found the contested design identical apart from immaterial eye-shape differences.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218