DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006378808-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-03

000117010

Contested design: 006378808-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006378808-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Haiyan Luovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1403, Duty Free Business Building, No. 6, Fuhua 1st Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Caixiu Zhongvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 686, Xiangdong Building, Guanghua Village, Shuikou Town, Xingning City, Guangdong Province, 514500, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Bubzi Co Precious Baby Handprint Footprint Plaster Imprint Set

ASIN B01GJ9VNJC; https://www.amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-12-10

Web disclosureAnnex 2

Pearhead Baby Prints Newborn Handprint and Footprint Photo Frame Kit

ASIN B01N4SDEND; https://www.amazon.com · Amazon.com · disclosed 2017-04-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier baby photo-frame designs disclosed on Amazon before the priority date.
  • The holder, though invited, filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de product listing for D1 as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR before 4 April 2019.
  • It found the contested and prior designs shared the same overall structure and key features, and the differences in the hand and foot prints did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068