DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000168034-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-05

000116788

Contested design: 000168034-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 000168034-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000168034-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Brigamo GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Waldstückerring 46a, 76756 Bellheim, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Bruder Spielwaren GmbH + Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Bernbacher Str. 96-98, 90768 Fürth, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

Feldhäcksler mit Vorsatzgerät

Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000062807-0001 · Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2004-01-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD D1, a previously disclosed toy forage harvester design.
  • The holder argued the contested design remained new and had individual character because D1 did not preclude registration.
  • The Division accepted D1 as properly disclosed prior art and found the differences prevented identity, so the novelty attack failed.
  • The Division found the overall impression remained the same for the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218