DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007506456-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-06

000115041

Contested design: 007506456-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 007506456-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Snores SIAvia PDF extraction

LV

"Barži", Tīnūžu pg., Ikšķiles nov., 5015 Latvia

Holder · RCD owner

WGL

LV

A.Dombrovska 45-7, Rīga, 1015 Latvia

Represented by

Inese Kārkle-Jurķe

Prior art cited (2)

International designD1

climbing frame

International design registration No DM/100 260 · HagueExpress database / International Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-03-30

Registered RCDD2⚠ rejected as evidence

climbing frame

Community design registration No 006576161-0001 · disclosed 2019-06-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on D1 and D2 as earlier climbing-frame designs producing the same overall impression.
  • Holder argued the contested design differed in colour, materials, knob shape and an auxiliary board, and that safety requirements limited the designer’s freedom.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed, excluded D2 under Article 7(2), found broad designer freedom, and treated the identified differences as insufficient to change the overall impression.
  • The contested design produced the same overall impression as D1, so the invalidity application was upheld and the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218