DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008590400-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-13

000117093

Contested design: 008590400-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085904000005 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zhejiang Dongrui Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Weiliu East Road, Tongqin Town, Wuyi City, Jinhua, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Piotr Niemyjskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Dworska 5B/7, 15756 Białystok, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

tool shed

Amazon.de ASIN B0713SLRKL · Amazon.de retail portal · disclosed 2017-04-26

Catalog

tool shed shown in the applicant's 2016-2017 catalogue

applicant catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on an identical tool shed offered on Amazon.de before the contested design's filing date.
  • The applicant also cited a pro forma invoice and its 2016-2017 catalogue; the holders filed no observations and left the application undefended.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing sufficiently proved disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and considered the invoice and catalogue corroborative.
  • The Division held the compared designs identical, found the contested design lacked novelty, upheld the application, and invalidated the RCD.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258