DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002750349-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-30

000115723

Contested design: 002750349-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002750349-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Donut Hive Inc.via PDF extraction

CA

1097 Lakeshore Road East, Mississauga, Ontario L5E 1E8, Canada

Holder · RCD owner

Imola Blágavia PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Jablonka lejtő 16, 1037 Budapest, Hungary

Represented by

Petra Erős

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Instagram image of a square doughnut design from account 'tonyssquaredonuts'

Instagram account 'tonyssquaredonuts' · disclosed 2014-12-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier square doughnut disclosures including an Instagram post dated 28 December 2014.
  • The holders argued the design was new and distinctive, claimed they had created the shape in 2014, and said the cited US Instagram disclosure lacked relevant European connection.
  • The Division found the Instagram post adequately proved prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and that the holders had not shown why EU specialist circles could not reasonably have known of it.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom for doughnut shapes, the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier square doughnut, so the application was upheld and the design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126097

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018