DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008447205-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-30

000117301

Contested design: 008447205-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, Community design No 008447205-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008447205-0002. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Specialized Furniture, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

de Les Comes, 44 bajos, 2, 08700 Igualada, España

Represented by

Ingenias

Holder · RCD owner

Soimer Telecomunicacions, S.L.U.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Pol. Ind. les Gavarreres, UA Sant Pere, 8, Bloc 1 NAU8, 08711 Odena, España

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnexo 8

SAIFOR 'ARCTIC V3' rack door / technical equipment cabinet door

http://www.saifor.net; https://www.facebook.com/saiforgroup · Internet Archive Wayback Machine; Facebook · disclosed 2016-06-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested RCD copied SAIFOR's ARCTIC V3 rack-door design disclosed before filing and therefore lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder was invited to comment but filed no observations; the applicant also requested oral proceedings if the documentary record were considered insufficient.
  • The Division refused oral proceedings, accepted prior disclosure from Wayback Machine, Facebook, and the other exhibits, and found only minor differences from the earlier rack-door design.
  • The contested RCD produced the same overall impression on informed users, lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), and was declared invalid; the remaining grounds were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117302

vs SOIMER TELECOMUNICACIONS, S.L.U.

2022-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)0610
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068