DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008449409-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-07

000117614

Contested design: 008449409-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008449409-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jiangxi Maitao Trading Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1903, Unit 2, Zixin Commercial Plaza, 2888 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang High-tech Zone, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

Represented by

Lawgical, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Yanzi QIAO

China (CN)

No. 68, Tuban Village, Tuban Town, Lin County, 033200 Shanxi, China

Represented by

Filippo Garbagnati

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

lamp products allegedly disclosed on Amazon online retail portals

Amazon · Amazon

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

lamp products allegedly disclosed on the 1688 Chinese online retail portal

1688 · 1688

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on alleged prior online disclosures of lamp designs on Amazon and 1688.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held that bare hyperlinks and unlinked product images were not solid, objective evidence of prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Because prior disclosure was not proven, the Division did not assess novelty or individual character further and rejected the application.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)267