DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008372551-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-15

000115986

Contested design: 008372551-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008372551-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangdong Loongon Animation & Culture Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

The east of Ningchuanbei Road and the north of Dengfeng Road, Chenghai New District, Chenghai Shantou, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Maria Alicia Izquierdo Blanco

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

LEGO 'Delivery Man' toy figure

https://www.brickowl.com/catalog/lego-city-minifigure-773752 · brickowl.com, corroborated by LEGO catalogues

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy figurine lacked individual character over earlier LEGO minifigure designs and also infringed its earlier LEGO trade mark rights.
  • The holder contended that the figurines created different overall impressions, that common features were widespread or technically driven, and that the crowded market limited designer freedom.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier 'Delivery Man' toy figure before 28 December 2020 and found the designer's freedom at least average for humanoid toy figures.
  • It held that the shared proportions, torso, legs, bent arms, C-shaped hands and cap dominated the comparison, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218