DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003562982-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-20

000117055

Contested design: 003562982-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 003562982-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SOKOŁÓWvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Al. 550-lecia 1, 08-300 Sokolow Podlaski Poland

Represented by

Anna Piotrowska

Holder · RCD owner

Grzegorz Wojdak

Poland (PL)

Izabelińska 23a, 05-126 Aleksandrów Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

recipe article showing a sausage design with crossed cuts

www.zyslijprzepis.pl · www.zyslijprzepis.pl · disclosed 2014-10-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested sausage design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier designs disclosed on internet sources.
  • Applicant relied, among other evidence, on a 14 October 2014 recipe article from www.zyslijprzepis.pl showing a sausage with crossed cuts.
  • Holder filed no observations despite being invited to respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the website extract as prior disclosure and found the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier sausage design.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6 CDR, so the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126098

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018