DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008805097-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-22

000117693

Contested design: 008805097-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Concaver Sp. z.o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Wabcz 60, 86-212 Stolno, Poland

Represented by

Michał Jędrzejewski

Holder · RCD owner

Arceo Gmbh

Germany (DE)

Schönbacher Str. 41-43, 35745 Herborn, Germany

Represented by

Omer Salvarcioglu

Legal grounds invoked

Article 98(4)Article 30(1)Article 28(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity of Community design No 0088050970001 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR.
  • Holder filed no observations; the decision addresses only the admissibility of the application.
  • The Division found the application was filed in German even though, under Article 98(4) CDR, it had to be filed in English.
  • Because the applicant did not remedy that deficiency within the time limit, the application was inadmissible under Article 30(1) CDIR.
  • The application was rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128826

vs Shenzhen Lireder Industrial Co., Ltd.

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)127
000120579

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2025-03-12Art 25(1)(b)127
000120480

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-13Art 25(1)(b)127
000120410

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000120158

vs elobau GmbH & Co. KG

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000120409

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000118721

vs HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2023-10-16Art 25(1)(b)127
000118758

vs HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2023-10-16Art 25(1)(b)127