DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000450986-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-25

000116186

Contested design: 000450986-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0004509860001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pepco Poland Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Strzeszyńska 73A, 60479 Poznań, Poland

Represented by

ROA Rasiewicz sp.k.

Holder · RCD owner

Porcelana Krzysztof Spolka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnosciavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Limanowskiego No 10, 58300 Wałbrzych, Poland

Represented by

Anna Rokicka

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

plates

RCD No 0002283330010 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2004-12-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier RCD No 0002283330010 for plates.
  • Holder accepted the prior disclosure but argued visible differences in wave direction, symmetry, proportions, rim shape, and colour created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was validly disclosed and that the shared quadrilateral wavy rim, proportions, and round cavity dominated the overall impression.
  • Given at least average designer freedom for plates, the identified differences were insufficient; the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078