DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008642185-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-26

000117854

Contested design: 008642185-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008642185-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangdong Sembo Culture Industry Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Tangxia Nanhan Garden, Xiachen Village, Shanghua Town, Chenghai District,, Shantou City, Guangdong, China

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

toy figure shape

EUTM registration No 50 450 · European Union Trade Marks Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on earlier EUTM registration No 50 450 and also invoking Article 25(1)(e) CDR.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but did not respond.
  • The Division found the earlier EUTM publication sufficient to establish disclosure before the contested design's filing date.
  • Comparing the toy figures, the Division held that minor differences in the head back and front of the legs did not alter the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b), so the Article 25(1)(e) ground was not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218