DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004031201-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-02

000116327

Contested design: 004031201-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Registered Community Design No. 004031201-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004031201-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Light Tec Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Unit 908-910, 9/F, Prosperity Center, 25 Chong Yip Street, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong

Holder · RCD owner

DecoTrend GmbH

Germany (DE)

zur Drehscheibe 5, 92637 Weiden, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

PatentD1

foldable lantern

US Patent No. 1,653,206 · United States patent publication · disclosed 1927-12-20

National designD2

three-dimensional star decoration / lighting device

German design No. 402009000767-0002 · DPMA Register / DPMA-Designblatt · disclosed 2009-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing that the contested light-chain star design was anticipated in overall impression by earlier disclosures, especially German design D2.
  • The holder contended that the contested design differed in structure, number and geometry of rays, symmetry, and cable arrangement, and argued that the applicant's combination of prior features was legally irrelevant.
  • The Division found D2 was validly disclosed before the filing date, identified a broad degree of design freedom, and held that the shared red-yellow color scheme, star structure, proportions, and overall geometry dominated the comparison.
  • The informed user would notice some differences, but they were minor compared with the common features, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.0426.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268