DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008136394-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-23

000116450

Contested design: 008136394-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008136394-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yu-Fen Kuovia PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

15F., No. 290, Sec. 2, Nantun Rd., Nantun District, Taichung City 408, Taiwan

Represented by

Cabinet Chaillot

Holder · RCD owner

Sunray Handtools CO., LTD.

Taiwan (TW)

2F., No. 9, Sec. 4, Hankou Rd., North Dist., Taichung City, 404 Taiwan

Prior art cited (4)

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

Taiwanese wrench design submitted for explanation purposes.

TW D208123 S · Taiwanese patent publication · disclosed 2020-11-11

PatentD1

Open-ended wrench inner jaw design shown in Figure 2.

CN201128125Y, Figure 2 · Chinese patent publication · disclosed 2008-10-08

PatentD2

Open-ended wrench inner jaw design shown in Figure 3.

CN201128125Y, Figure 3 · Chinese patent publication · disclosed 2008-10-08

PatentFigure 7⚠ rejected as evidence

"anti-collapse angle open-end wrench" figure submitted by the applicant.

M571285 / TWM571285

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued lack of novelty and individual character over Chinese patent CN201128125Y and Taiwanese patent material, and said the contested wrench features were solely dictated by technical function.
  • The holder replied that the cited evidence was procedurally deficient and that the contested design retained non-functional visual choices, including groove shapes, arrangement, and interior planes.
  • The Division refused the unclear M571285 evidence, accepted Figures 2 and 3 of CN201128125Y as prior disclosures, but found the technical-function objection unproven and the cited designs created different overall impressions.
  • The invalidity application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKINÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122554

vs CZECHPOL servis s.r.o.

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)087
000122442

vs CZECHPOL servis s.r.o.

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)087
000122334

vs PRETENSADOS DURÁN, S. L.

2024-06-06Art 25(1)(b)087
000122636

vs Wenzhou Falante Lock Industry Co. LTD.

2024-02-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000120319

vs MARTOM

2023-07-19Art 25(1)(b)087
000119299

vs Arne Thuresson Byggmaterial AB

2023-03-07Art 25(1)(b)087
000118040

vs Arne Thuresson Byggmaterial AB

2023-03-01Art 25(1)(b)087
000118177

vs MetroVision GmbH

2022-12-16Art 25(1)(b)087