DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008104822-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-18

000122442

Contested design: 008104822-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008104822-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MET-GAL Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul.Galicyjska 9, 32-040 Rzeszotary, Poland

Represented by

Marek Mikosza

Holder · RCD owner

Czechpol Servis s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Sokolovská 2112/74c, 32300 Plzeň, Czech Republic

Represented by

Langrova, S.R.O.

Prior art cited (3)

Prior useprior design 1

hanger or coat hook designs shown in the applicant's 2018 catalogue and corroborated by 2018 sales invoices

WM 041 / Wieszak WM 41 G2, G5, G6 and G8 · applicant's catalogue and sales invoices · disclosed 2018-10-01

Web disclosureprior design 2⚠ rejected as evidence

products shown in extracts from the applicant's website

Wieszak WM 041 P2 and G6 · applicant website extracts

Otherprior design 3⚠ rejected as evidence

undated picture of designs with corresponding references submitted in observations

Wieszak WM 041 P2, G2, G5, G6 and G8 · undated picture submitted by applicant

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the contested coat hook lacked novelty and individual character over earlier WM 041 hanger designs allegedly marketed in the EU since 2018.
  • Holder disputed disclosure and argued the contested design differed through screw holes, sharper edges, a flat central pin and other visible design elements.
  • The Division accepted disclosure only for catalogue and invoice-backed WM 041 variants, but found website and undated image evidence insufficient to prove public availability.
  • Comparing the disclosed prior designs with the contested design, the Division found noticeable differences that produced a different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122554

vs CZECHPOL servis s.r.o.

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)087
000122334

vs PRETENSADOS DURÁN, S. L.

2024-06-06Art 25(1)(b)087
000122636

vs Wenzhou Falante Lock Industry Co. LTD.

2024-02-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000120319

vs MARTOM

2023-07-19Art 25(1)(b)087
000119299

vs Arne Thuresson Byggmaterial AB

2023-03-07Art 25(1)(b)087
000118040

vs Arne Thuresson Byggmaterial AB

2023-03-01Art 25(1)(b)087
000118177

vs MetroVision GmbH

2022-12-16Art 25(1)(b)087
000117095

vs Dingguo Zhang

2022-10-07Art 25(1)(b)087