DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008583124-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-07

000117095

Contested design: 008583124-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008583124-0001 is rejected. 3. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen City Ju Xing Rong Trading Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

San Lian Community, Jing Giu New Village, No. 154, room 603, Shenzhen 518000, China

Represented by

Jörg Brettschneider

Holder · RCD owner

Dingguo Zhang

China (CN)

10CD, Building 2, Xinhua Building, 543 Xinhua Road, Changning District, Shanghai 200000, China

Represented by

CO LA Consulting

Michele Carella

Prior art cited (4)

OtherAnnex 2⚠ rejected as evidence

Pictures of an alleged earlier plier design.

Web disclosureAnnex 3⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon sellercentral order extract for the alleged earlier plier design.

ASIN B0995PRMJX · sellercentral.amazon.de

Prior useAnnex 4⚠ rejected as evidence

Sworn statement alleging pre-filing sales of the earlier plier design.

Amazon seller ID A3V0FPVRC1KAI2 · Sworn statement of Huali XU

Web disclosureAnnex 5⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon listing for the Wieprima Pinces perforatrices plier design.

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0995PRMJX · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-08-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested plier design lacked novelty because an identical plier had allegedly been sold on Amazon before 22/06/2021.
  • The applicant relied on photographs, Amazon listing and order extracts, and a sworn statement; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found none of the evidence proved disclosure before the filing date, and the sworn statement was insufficient without reliable corroboration.
  • The invalidity application was rejected as unfounded, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122554

vs CZECHPOL servis s.r.o.

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)087
000122442

vs CZECHPOL servis s.r.o.

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)087
000122334

vs PRETENSADOS DURÁN, S. L.

2024-06-06Art 25(1)(b)087
000122636

vs Wenzhou Falante Lock Industry Co. LTD.

2024-02-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000120319

vs MARTOM

2023-07-19Art 25(1)(b)087
000119299

vs Arne Thuresson Byggmaterial AB

2023-03-07Art 25(1)(b)087
000118040

vs Arne Thuresson Byggmaterial AB

2023-03-01Art 25(1)(b)087
000118177

vs MetroVision GmbH

2022-12-16Art 25(1)(b)087