DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008768469-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-24

000117737

Contested design: 008768469-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008768469-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Thomas Wambergvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Tuemosevej 1, 4850 Stubbekøbing, Denmark

Holder · RCD owner

vanDockumGROUP v/Charlotte van Dockum Davidsen

Denmark (DK)

Bymidten 39, 1E, 3500 Værløse, Denmark

Represented by

Budde Schou A/S

Prior art cited (1)

Publication

brochure image of an acoustic panel with slats

AKUSTIK MAGASIN · Treetops A/S, Denmark

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested acoustic-panel design lacked novelty and individual character in light of prior slatted panels marketed for years.
  • He relied in particular on the 2020 AKUSTIK MAGASIN brochure showing a slatted acoustic panel; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the brochure as prior disclosure, found broad design freedom, and considered the contested and prior panels very similar in form, proportions, and slat arrangement.
  • The contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258