DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 008776306-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-24

000117738

Contested design: 008776306-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0087763060004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Thomas Wamberg

Denmark (DK)

Tuemosevej 1, 4850 Stubbekøbing, Denmark

Holder · RCD owner

vanDockumGROUP v/Charlotte van Dockum Davidsen

Denmark (DK)

Bymidten 39, 1E, 3500 Værløse, Denmark

Represented by

Budde Schou A/S

Prior art cited (1)

Publication

brochure image of an acoustic panel with slats

AKUSTIK MAGASIN · Treetops A/S, Denmark

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested acoustic panel design lacked novelty and individual character because similar slatted panels had long been marketed, including in the 2020 AKUSTIK MAGASIN brochure.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the brochure as prior disclosure under Article 7 and compared the brochure image with the contested line drawings from the perspective of the informed user.
  • Given broad design freedom and the strong similarity in form and configuration, the Division found no different overall impression and declared the design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108310

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000108309

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130546

vs BESTON METAL S.R.L.

2026-06-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130586

vs ANTEC SOLAR S.R.L.

2026-06-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258