DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008661458-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-06

000117053

Contested design: 008661458-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008661458-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Krzysztof Kułakowskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Gutki 4, 37-450 Nisko, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Creativecooper Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Niezłomnych 33, 37-450 Stalowa Wola, Poland

Represented by

Zbigniew Szołtys

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

WeEco 'Beczka Barek' barrel furniture/bar product

http://weeco.eu; https://gadgets.pl · Internet Archive · disclosed 2020-06-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested barrel furniture design lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier WeEco 'Beczka Barek' product disclosed before the filing date.
  • Holder disputed identity and overall impression, cited shelf and colour differences, and invoked Article 7(2) CDR based on disclosures allegedly linked to the applicant's former partner.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive captures as prior disclosure, found the grace period unavailable, and assessed designer freedom for composite storage furniture as almost unlimited.
  • Because the shared barrel shape, front opening, light wood, black hoops, and central shelf dominated the overall impression, the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068