DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005639036-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-07

000117575

Contested design: 005639036-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005639036-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sayano Deutschland GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stauffenbergstraße 27, 72336 Balingen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

kaiyuan xu

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 9 Saltmeadows Industrial Estate Saltmeadows Road, Gateshead, Newcastle upon Tyne NE10 0EQ, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

transparent shaker shown in a YouTube video

www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2016-04-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying among other things on a YouTube video uploaded on 28 April 2016 showing a transparent shaker.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the publicly accessible YouTube posting as a prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR before the contested design’s filing date.
  • After direct comparison, the Division found no material differences in the designs’ visible features, so the contested design was not new and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078