DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007807631-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-14

000117094

Contested design: 007807631-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0078076310001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sc Arkada Steel Map Srlvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

strada Ferma Barsa nr.20, 21, sat Halchiu, comuna Halchiu, jud., Brasov, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Bilka Steel SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

17 Henri Coanda Street, City of Brasov, Brasov County, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDAnnex 1

fences (part of -)

Community design registration No 0055006590001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-07-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the fence-panel design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Community design registration No 0055006590001.
  • Holder replied that the cited design differed in non-immaterial features and produced a different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, found designer freedom not severely limited, and held visible differences in the upper part, side indents, profile extremities and colour were decisive.
  • Because the contested design remained new and had individual character, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128596

vs Griptel AB

2025-07-17Art 25(1)(b)257
000124436

vs Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-11-19Art 25(1)(b)257
000121100

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121138

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121099

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000120379

vs Ergosafe Aktiebolag

2023-10-26Art 25(1)(b)257
000120958

vs Yimei Zhu

2023-07-27Art 25(1)(b)257
000119859

vs BoZarc

2023-06-02Art 25(1)(b)257