DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008362198-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-14

000117998

Contested design: 008362198-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008362198-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nándor Szőnyivia PDF extraction

SK

ul. E. B. Lukáca 1356/36, 94501 Komárno Slovakia

Holder · RCD owner

Rubber-World KFT.via PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Kunhegyes, Gyepszél utca 69., 5340 Hungary

Represented by

Kacsukpatent KFT

Zsófia Kacsuk

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Screenshot of a Facebook publication showing a combination of two lawn grids put together

Technoah BV Facebook site · disclosed 2019-10-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on a Facebook post dated 9 October 2019 showing the same lawn grid design.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the Facebook screenshot proved prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and that the earlier design showed the same configuration and shape.
  • Because the contested design was identical to the earlier disclosure, it lacked novelty and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258