DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002333633-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-14

000118042

Contested design: 002333633-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 002333633-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Der Antragsteller trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yufu Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

JinCheng industial zone, JingSha, Danzaotown, NanHai, FoShan, Guangdong, Volksrepublik China

Holder · RCD owner

Tempo International GmbH

Germany (DE)

Paul-Dessau-Straße 1, 22761 Hamburg, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useD1⚠ rejected as evidence

table grill (Model No.: DT-01F) allegedly shown at the Canton Fair and offered to Severin Asia Ltd.

Canton Import and Export Fair; private email and offer to Severin Asia Ltd.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(f)Article 25(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on D1, an earlier table-grill design allegedly disclosed at the Canton Fair and in emails and an offer sent to Severin Asia Ltd.
  • Applicant also invoked Article 25(1)(f), arguing the contested design unlawfully used a work protected by German copyright and that the applicant had acquired rights from the author, Kelei Hong.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found no reliable independent evidence proving disclosure of D1 before the filing date and held that the applicant had not proved ownership or entitlement to assert the alleged copyright.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129182

vs Guangzhou L-TEK Enterprise Co.,Ltd

2025-09-25Art 25(1)(b)077
000120871

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2025-01-16Art 25(1)(b)077
000122014

vs EDIESI SL

2023-09-07Art 25(1)(b)077
000118726

vs DAKA RESEARCH INC.

2023-04-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000119513

vs Weiming Li

2023-04-14Art 25(1)(b)077
000118241

vs Noi srl

2023-01-25Art 25(1)(b)077
000116574

vs Horizons Group (London) Limited

2022-11-16Art 25(1)(b)077
000118157

vs Qing Wang

2022-11-09Art 25(1)(b)077