DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008739320-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-09

000118157

Contested design: 008739320-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0087393200001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Coppa Cocktails B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Joop Geesinkweg 901, 1114 AB Amsterdam, Netherlands

Represented by

Chiever BV

Holder · RCD owner

Qing Wang

China (CN)

No. 4, Hubei Road, Lv er Village, Lvtan Town, Wuyi County, Zhejiang Province 321200, China

Represented by

Manuel de Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

bottle

RCD No 0017360000001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-07-29

Registered RCD

bottle

RCD No 0017360000002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-07-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(d) and Article 6, relying on its earlier RCDs for bottles and arguing the contested shaker created the same overall impression.
  • The holder did not submit observations despite being invited to respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) was not satisfied because the earlier registered designs had been published before, not after, the contested design's filing date.
  • The Division nevertheless assessed individual character under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6, found the prior designs disclosed, but concluded visible differences in shape, cap details and finish created a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129182

vs Guangzhou L-TEK Enterprise Co.,Ltd

2025-09-25Art 25(1)(b)077
000120871

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2025-01-16Art 25(1)(b)077
000122014

vs EDIESI SL

2023-09-07Art 25(1)(b)077
000118726

vs DAKA RESEARCH INC.

2023-04-27Art 25(1)(b)077
000119513

vs Weiming Li

2023-04-14Art 25(1)(b)077
000118241

vs Noi srl

2023-01-25Art 25(1)(b)077
000116574

vs Horizons Group (London) Limited

2022-11-16Art 25(1)(b)077
000118042

vs Tempo International GmbH

2022-09-14Art 25(1)(b)077