DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008414221-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-15

000117437

Contested design: 008414221-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0084142210001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Symetricus Sp. z o. o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Bażantów 6b/3, 40668 Katowice, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Plucińska

Holder · RCD owner

Andrzej Biały

Poland (PL)

Al. Wolności 20/42, 42300 Myszków, Poland

Represented by

Daniel Kurdubski

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useAnnex 2 / Annex 4

capsules in oval box with applicator / oval box with labels, 100 capsules per box

seller contract and invoice · disclosed 2020-12-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant alleged bad faith and argued that the contested design lacked novelty and individual character because its product had already been designed, sold and marketed before filing.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held that the 11/12/2020 contract and 18/12/2020 invoice objectively proved disclosure of the prior design before the contested design's filing date under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found the overall impressions the same and any possible body-width difference insignificant, so the contested design lacked individual character; the bad-faith ground was inadmissible because it is not listed in Article 25(1) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130847

vs Ying CAO

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126655

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126656

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126597

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278