DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008630255-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-20

000116731

Contested design: 008630255-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008630255-0005 is declared invalid. 2. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Damian Małońvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Ul. Janowska 113, 08110 Siedlce, Poland

Represented by

Łukasz Korga

Holder · RCD owner

Kingwise Technology Co., Limited

Hong Kong (HK)

Rm 18, 27/F Ho King Comm Ctr, 2-16 Fayuen St, Mongkok, Kln, Hong Kong

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Antena TRANS-DATA GSM/DCS/UMTS/KYZ8,2/9,5 outdoor aerial

http://www.dipol.com.pl/antena_trans-data_gsm-dcs-umts_kyz8_2-9_5_A741030.htm · dipol.com.pl via Internet Archive · disclosed 2018-05-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on an archived 30 May 2018 webpage showing the earlier TRANS-DATA aerial.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and novelty, arguing the archive did not prove availability and the designs differed in proportions, holes, hinges, and overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as prior disclosure accessible to specialised circles in the EU before the filing date.
  • It found the compared designs identical apart from immaterial details, so the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148