DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007441944-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-23

000118098

Contested design: 007441944-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007441944-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Taylor Wessing Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbBvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Thurn-und-Taxis-Platz 6, 60313 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Represented by

Taylor Wessing

Holder · RCD owner

Power Beauty (Dongguan) Industrial Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No 1, Eastern Industry Park, Shujiu Village, Changping town, Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Manuel de Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

lamp

Community design registration No 007260344-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-12-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on at least four earlier designs including prior RCD No 007260344-0001.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the prior RCD had been validly disclosed before the filing date and that both lamp designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 350 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268