DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008705297-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-06

000117130

Contested design: 008705297-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld 2. Registered Community design No 008705297-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

iDistribution Srlvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via delle industrie 8, 03100 Frosinone, Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Simone Huang

Italy (IT)

Via aiaccia 28, Poggio a caiano, Toscana 17ALY, Italy

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon listing for a 'Custodia Protettivo per IQOS 3.0 DUO' protective case for electronic cigarettes

ASIN B07Z3LWHMM · Amazon.it · disclosed 2019-10-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier Amazon-disclosed IQOS case available before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as proof of public disclosure from 13/10/2019 and found the earlier and contested cases produced the same overall impression.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the application was upheld and the design declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130847

vs Ying CAO

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126655

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126656

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126597

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278