DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008368047-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-06

000118198

Contested design: 008368047-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008368047-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

West & East GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Vahrenwalder Str. 213, 30165 Hannover, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rrechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Jiuxiang Guoji Maoyi Beijing Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 313-523, 3rd Floor, Shanshui Building, No.3 Gulou East Street, Miyun District, Beijing, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for the 'MaxVitalis' cushion

https://amazon.de; ASIN B07BM945JC · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-03-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Amazon disclosure of the same cushion design dating from 20/03/2018.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the claimed internet disclosure or the substantive invalidity grounds.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found substantial designer freedom for cushion shape and appearance.
  • It held that the shared triangular shape, central buttons, side pocket, borders, and overall appearance created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068