DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008326821-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-11

000118597

Contested design: 008326821-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0083268210002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Anhui Jikedongshen Fitness Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

A5, phase II, Gongtou-Liheng Industrial Square, Taohua Industrial Park, Feixi County, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Xueyan Xingvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

101 Xingye Road, Xixiang, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (1)

Utility modelEnclosure 3

resistance band exercising apparatus

CN 206792893 U · Chinese utility model publication · disclosed 2017-12-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested exercise-band design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier disclosed designs.
  • The applicant relied, among other evidence, on Chinese utility model CN 206792893 U, published on 26 December 2017 as Enclosure 3.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the prior utility model was disclosed before the filing date and created the same overall impression despite minor handle-grip differences.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218