DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 000222070-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-13

000115910

Contested design: 000222070-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld and Registered Community design No 000222070-0003 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000222070-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Alcom International GmbH

Germany (DE)

Ernst-Abbe-Str. 3, 72770 Reutlingen, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Wolfgang Rixen

Germany (DE)

Friedenstr. 107-109, 42699 Solingen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

CatalogD1

profile bar

Paletti catalog · disclosed 2001-04-01

CatalogD2

profile bar

Paletti catalog · disclosed 2002-04-01

CatalogD3

profile bar

Paletti catalog · disclosed 2004-04-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant attacked the design for lack of novelty and individual character over Paletti catalog designs D1 to D3 and also invoked visibility, technical-function, and must-fit objections.
  • The holder argued the design was new and individual, reflected aesthetic choices despite technical aspects, remained visible in use, and in any event qualified for the modular-system exception.
  • The Division found Article 4(2) inapplicable, held exclusive technical function was not proven, and considered the product part of a modular system so Article 8(3) displaced any Article 8(2) objection.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression, so individual character was lacking and the design was invalidated with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108310

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000108309

vs TA Towers ApS

2026-06-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130546

vs BESTON METAL S.R.L.

2026-06-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000130586

vs ANTEC SOLAR S.R.L.

2026-06-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258