DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008855969-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-04

000118459

Contested design: 008855969-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0088559690001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Adam Pawlikvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Centralna 6, 43346 Bielsko-Biała, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Contex Experts K.L.Bartczak Spółka Jawnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Tadeusza Brzozy 6, 54115 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Daniel Kurdubski

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

rectangular profile

http://www.turnmatte.com · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2014-10-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested design lacked novelty because an identical design had been disclosed before filing, relying in particular on a Wayback Machine capture of turnmatte.com.
  • Holder was invited to comment on the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the archived webpage as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and compared only the protected solid-line outer rectangular profile of the contested design.
  • Finding no non-immaterial differences between the compared designs, the Division invalidated the contested design for lack of novelty and ordered the holder to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258