DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001076178-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-11

000115562

Contested design: 001076178-0010

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0010761780010 is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0010761780010 is rejected.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangdong Qman Toys Industry Co.,Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Intersection of West Side of Xingye West 2nd Road and North Side of Xingye South Road, Laimei Industrial Zone, Chenghai District, Shantou, Guangdong 515000, China

Represented by

Von Bülow & Tamada

Holder · RCD owner

Lego A/S

Denmark (DK)

Aastvej 1, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

toy building element from Lego set No 6981 'Aerial Intruder'

Lego piece No 4073 · www.bricklink.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 8(3)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the toy building element's features were solely dictated by technical function and that it lacked individual character over Lego piece No 4073.
  • The holder argued Article 8(3) CDR protected the design as part of a modular system and that the prior design differed significantly in visible features and overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division held that the interconnection arguments fell within the modular-system exception of Article 8(3) CDR, so the design could not be invalidated under Article 8(1) on that basis.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of piece No 4073 via Bricklink but found the hollow top and faceted inner walls created a different overall impression, so the design retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)217
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)217
000129621

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000129624

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000129661

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000130709

vs Shantou Chenghai district Shuangjia plastic toy factory

2026-02-26Art 25(1)(b)217
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)217
000130683

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)217