DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 001076178-0017

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-11

000115563

Contested design: 001076178-0017

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay EUR 400 toward the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0010761780017 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangdong Qman Toys Industry Co.,Ltd

China (CN)

Intersection of West Side of Xingye West 2nd Road and North Side of Xingye South Road, Laimei Industrial Zone, Chenghai District, Shantou, Guangdong 515000, China

Represented by

Von Bülow & Tamada

Holder · RCD owner

Lego A/S

Denmark (DK)

Aastvej 1, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

toy building element known as a jumper plate

Lego piece No 2460 in sets No 1298 'Advent Calendar' and No 4701 'Sorting Hat' · Brickset / LEGO set pages

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 8(3)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the Lego jumper-plate design was dictated by technical function and lacked individual character over earlier Lego piece No 2460.
  • The holder replied that the design contributed to the aesthetics of finished constructions, benefitted from the modular-system exception, and remained individually distinctive from the prior piece.
  • The Division held that the interoperability features fell within the modular-system context so Article 8(1) could not invalidate the design, then found visible differences from piece No 2460 sufficient for a different overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130844

vs Lego A/S

2026-06-30Art 25(1)(b)217
000072551

vs Lv Cheng Liang

2026-06-26Art 25(1)(b)217
000129541

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129524

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129510

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129525

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129509

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129511

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217