DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001371207-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-16

000116147

Contested design: 001371207-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 001371207-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dynamic Biogas Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Bóżnicza 12/4, 61-752 Poznań, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Artur Ratajczak

Poland (PL)

Październikowa 10, 63-230 Witaszyce, Poland

Prior art cited (3)

OtherD1

construction project showing a centrally built-in stream mixer

Interchangeable Construction Project Of Agricultural Biogas Plant 1,0 Mw · construction project for biogas plant in Jaromierz, Poland

OtherD2

construction project of a biogas plant in Upałty Małe

Interchangeable Construction Project of Agricultural Biogas Plant 1,0 MW · construction project / construction-site photographs

PatentD3

Fermentator gazowy

PL 230678 · Polish patent publication · disclosed 2018-11-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the mixing-device design was an invisible component of a complex biogas-tank product and also relied on earlier construction projects, a patent, and copyright claims.
  • The holder argued the device could remain visible in normal use, disputed disclosure and authorship, and said the cited earlier designs came from the holder or fell within a grace period.
  • The Division found the product was a component incorporated in reservoirs and that the evidence showed it remained invisible during normal use, with visibility arising only during assembly or repair.
  • The application was upheld under Article 4(2) CDR without examining the remaining invalidity or copyright grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158