DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008306385-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-21

000118359

Contested design: 008306385-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008306385-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Personality Gym ABvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Bultvägen 5, 553 02 Jönköping, Sweden

Represented by

Rouse AB

Holder · RCD owner

Hadley International Trading (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 1228, Building1, Sushangxindi plaza, 555 Zongguantang RD, Gusu district, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

dumbbell marketed as the world's smartest dumbbell

http://www.nuoathletics.com · Internet Archive / nuoathletics.com · disclosed 2016-10-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity because the contested dumbbell design lacked novelty or individual character over earlier dumbbell designs disclosed online before 2 December 2020.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted Internet Archive captures of nuoathletics.com from 29 October 2016 and 19 May 2019 as prior disclosure of the same dumbbell design.
  • With at least average designer freedom, the shared shape, anchorage, discs and colour scheme outweighed minor handle and end-part differences.
  • The contested design lacked individual character, so the application was upheld, the RCD was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to bear fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218