DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008815633-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-25

000118837

Contested design: 008815633-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008815633-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangzhou Baviss Automotive Products Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

5th Floor, No. 66-8, Longcha Road, Dayuan Village, Baiyun District, Taihe, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000 China

Represented by

METIDA

Holder · RCD owner

Shanxi Binbin Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

1419 Times Tianfeng, 120 Yingze West Street, Wanbailin District, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Dimitris Morides

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

Multi-functional non-slip mat

CN 306844892 · Chinese IP Office patent database · disclosed 2021-09-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested mobile phone stand lacked novelty and individual character because nearly identical designs had been disclosed before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied, among other things, on Chinese design patent CN 306844892 published on 24/09/2021; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Chinese patent publication as prior disclosure and found the designer's freedom was not severely limited for mobile phone stands.
  • The Division found the designs created the same overall impression despite a minor colour difference, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148