DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008632996-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-25

000118958

Contested design: 008632996-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008632996-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Carl Freudenberg KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Höhnerweg 2-4, 69469 Weinheim, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Spontexvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

420, rue d'Estienne d'Orves, F-92705 Colombes Cedex France

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAttachment 1

Screenshots from a YouTube video showing the household sponge 'Debbie Mayer Genius Sponge'

https://www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2018-03-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosed sponge designs including a YouTube video of the 'Debbie Mayer Genius Sponge'.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube video as prior disclosure before the filing date and found the informed user would receive the same overall impression from the compared sponge designs.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the design was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078